Identify two news sources that have written about the same topic in their editorial page. One sources will be USA Today and the other is from your own research.
What is the main point of the article, that is, what are they arguing for or against?
What is the claim and counter claim?
In the article "Let Arizona use E-Verify to curb the hiring of illegal workers," author Michael Chow states that a "law, signed by Democratic governor Janet Napolitano, mandates that employers confirm job applicants' legality through E-Verify, a federal online service that checks workers against the Social Security database. Companies that don't comply can be stripped of their business licenses." Chow argues that the state of Arizona should be allowed to mandate that companies must use E-Verify. He also states that the law "should become mandatory not just in Arizona, but nationally"
Compare and Contrast Opinion Piece
In the article "Let Arizona use E-Verify to curb the hiring of illegal workers," author Michael Chow states that a "law, signed by Democratic governor Janet Napolitano, mandates that employers confirm job applicants' legality through E-Verify, a federal online service that checks workers against the Social Security database. Companies that don't comply can be stripped of their business licenses." Chow argues that the state of Arizona should be allowed to mandate that companies must use E-Verify. He also states that the law "should become mandatory not just in Arizona, but nationally"
However, Robin Conrad's article "Bad for Business and Workers" takes the opposite side.
History of Immigration in America